Gun Control a History and military perspective

I disagree with much of that article Steve but it was a good read.. if the goons come I don't think many will stand up.. I could be wrong.. I see something like the Rodney King riots on a scale X 100,000.. I could be wrong about that too

Thanks for the feedback, firecracker...

I believe the key to exposing the U.N. lies within the difference between individual and collective rights. It's a fine line and difficult to understand... G. Edward Griffin gives a great vocal illustration in a Toronto speech using "Animal Farm" as an analogy. I have to admit, until I was made aware of how the U.N. agenda was sooooo different from the U.S. Constitution's focus on individual rights, both unalienable and inalienable, (one granted by the creator, the other granted by constitutional law), I didn't recognize the difference. When the dawn broke, I actually felt anger at the veil having been so successfully drawn to disguise the difference. In short, the U.N. is NOT a peace-keeping organization. Based on that alone, we should withdraw U.S. membership. Keeping in mind that "gun control" mandates originate at the U.N. it would solve the problems of the increased demand by the current administration.

That revelation may well open minds, previously unaware. Unfortunately, as stated many times prior, the brainwashing has had an effect on American youth and the upcoming generations that is so profound and effective that (I find) their minds are closed to discussion.
Blame is placed on the previous generations for having repeatedly voted for the culprits that have formed their future. So looking back, (as Obama suggested) is not preferable.

Only public indictments for those in government, now with irrefutable evidence of their guilt, well publicized as the Nuremberg Trials were, can bring awareness of how important it is to correct the mistakes of the past, before a better future can be established.

The difference between a civilized and uncivilized society is LAW. Our leaders have not been held accountable to the law at least since Watergate. Without LAW, chaos inevitably follows.

Ref: Indictments...

Since all branches of current gov't are not working in the best interests of this nation, including the Dept of Justice, our only choice is to continue to search for someone or something that appears to have enough power and influence to affect change for the better, preferably without violence.

I was very encouraged after listening to Dr. Pieczenik's "Talk", given on the 10th Anniversary of 9/11, still available for viewing . My understanding is that this nation has "protectors" in place capable of defending the United States, as a Republic, against usurpers of power. The impression was that Dr. Pieczenik has enough influence on both sides of the struggle and has now been motivated to encourage a solution, peaceful or otherwise.

Remaining aware that anyone can use skillful influence to garner a desired result, all sources of information should be taken with a grain of salt...or in Reagan's words: "Trust But Verify."