A role model for world leaders?

Interesting. I've got a lot of comments about this most informative talk. I'm getting a look into the psyche of Dr. Pieczenik. I think he's right about some things, and wrong about some things. For instance, in labeling our Founding Fathers "terrorists," I believe he's failing to distinguish between terrorism and guerrilla warfare. This also leads to an error in logic - and false syllogism - that the Left-wing can pick up on and use against traditional Constitutionalists. Syllogism: Speaking in terms of "moral equivalence" If A = B and B = C, then A = C. Hence, If A (Terrorists) = B (our Founding Fathers), and B (our Founding Fathers) = C (today's Constitutionalists, like Alex Jones), then A (Terrorists) = C (today's Constitutionalists, like Alex Jones). We can start there... I can write a whole short-essay on Dr. Pieczenik's arguments, logic, truth and fallacies...

From a college report I did entitled: "Guerrilla Movements in Colombia:"
This report is intended as a brief overview of guerrilla movements in Colombia. It will primarily cover the major left-wing groups, right-wing groups, and the latest threat to Colombia’s order, stability, and security: narco-guerrillas and narco-terrorism.

Although the political and ideological differences between each organization may vary, there is considerable overlap and dovetailing of the modus operandi within the respective guerrilla movements in Colombia and throughout Latin America. One guerrilla group, The April-19 Movement (M-19), actually started out as an extreme right-wing youth group and later became a left-wing communist organization. When describing certain aspects of guerrilla movements, the terms used may bear similarity to each other and the differences in meaning may be quite subtle. For instance, “guerrilla movement ”and “insurgency” will be used synonymously. To wit:

*Despite the difficulties involved in attempting to define basic terms such as “terrorism” and “guerrilla warfare,” it is possible to make certain distinctions. With regard to terrorism and insurgency in general, and in Latin America in particular, the first distinction to be made is that between violence in service of a specific strategy and program—the replacement of the existing sociopolitical system with a well-articulated and precisely defined alternative (guerrilla warfare)—and violence with an open-ended aim—the overthrow of the present regime with the hope that, in time, a “better” one will emerge as a result of “popular dynamics” (terrorism). These two strategies differ greatly in terms of their targets, aims, scope, size and level of organization, public support, leadership background, and effectiveness.

To this point the terms “revolutionary” and “terrorist” have been used inter-changeably, despite some obvious and some not so obvious differences between them. The operational as well as the theoretical distinctions between the two are perhaps clearer in reference to Latin America than elsewhere. Murder, for ex-ample, can be an aim in itself, for the sake of terrorizing the populace as a whole, or can have the aim of killing specific political or military targets.

Violence by ricochet, the killing of a person to intimidate another in disregard of noncombatants, is the terrorist’s mark, and it is not generally found in most vigilante-type rightest groups, or for that matter in most bona fide revolutionary organizations in Latin America.

*Radu, Michael and Vladimir Tismaneanu, Latin American Revolutionaries: Goals and Methods. 1991. pg. 19.

So, to summarize: If Constitutionalists, like Alex Jones & Co., or the Oath Keepers were to act as counter-revolutionaries, fighting, by force of arms, the Obama transformation of America (a Marxist soft revolution through non-violent, evolutinary socialism) if Obama tries to take Americans' weapons, they would be guerrila fighters, not-terrorists, as long as they targeted legitimate political, military and non-military, government entitities (such as FEMA camps) that facilitating the de facto & de jure destruction of America's Contitutional, GOD GIVEN rights. That is, rights that don't come from the State; hence, cannot be taken away.

My background: Diploma: US Army Counterintelligence School; Diploma US Army Intel Analyst School.

E-mail me at: electricinstant@yahoo.com

Take care..

Funnily enough I saw a picture of jose mujica in a "gutter press" newspaper and it gave a couple of paragraphs basically highlighting him as semi eccentric and I really didn't realize he was the president of Uruguay!! This man was confined in the bottom of a well during imprisonment!! For two years!! My kind of leader a man who knows the lows of life and understands changing situations or as Wikipedia puts it a man who can think out the box, deary me other so called leaders should be ashamed of themselves as they probably haven't been involved in a school yard fight, too busy feathering their nests that's why!! Jose mujica is exactly what he looks, a man who has lived life and I loved this line he gave "avoid exhausting confrontations in which much more is lost when you are in government you must also care about the rest, nobody has the right to make the life of the rest miserable". Obama, Cameron ect sect over to you!!

How about a show discussing predictive programming and occult numerology in the media, plus potential solutions? I would be willing to do a Skype interview about this with you. My latest research:-
johnkimber.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/the-62213-u-s-coup-plot-revealed/
johnkimber.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/9-11-01-and-6-22-13-terrorism-foretold-in-simpsons/