|
|
Post by Dr. Steve Pieczenik on Jan 6, 2013 12:36:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Kechula on Jan 14, 2013 11:39:08 GMT -5
Regarding your latest article on SA:
Very interesting, insightful piece. Nice display of geopolitical chops. And well written. I agree and disagree. If the (then) Soviets were doing what we're doing in N. Africa and the Middle East (and they tried in Afghanistan) - called spreading "democracy" - we'd call it the Domino Effect of communist subversion and revolution.
What sort of regime are we going to place in SA? Seems like the Jimmy Carter libs -under Brzezinsk - really dig putting the extremist Muslims in power. And like Diem, Samosa, Batista, etc., any regime, except a traditional king or monarchy, is a good one. Something else is afoot here in the "Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order:" Confusion, destabilization, demoralization, materialism, counter-traditionalism, Luciferianism, post-modernism and anti-traditional religion.
What say you, Steve, about the horrors of abortion in the Holy Land? Good, like evil, is one and indivisible... You must take a position on the New World Order: i.e. The Global Regime of Economic Interdependence. SHOW US YOUR CARDS!
|
|
janie
New Member
Posts: 8
|
Post by janie on Jan 19, 2013 12:15:12 GMT -5
That's some article, and cogent argument for its conclusion. Does anyone at the WH ever read stuff like this? |
|
|
|
Post by inventorunknown on Apr 23, 2013 20:11:15 GMT -5
Something relating to the article,
In 2007, B--j—g, and relating to some previous things mentioned
Was approached by ‘contractor’ in small restaurant in the above city, they were assigned to provide security for eight party talks ‘US side’. Another objective was to make threats to --, to depart this country immediately. This was due to earlier leaks about ‘providing info’ for specific investigations. The contractor approached --, sat down ‘table across’ and starting talking, asking some questions, then went on for about 15 minutes talking about how he hated the US. Thereafter stated he was assigned for the above stated, started bragging about how he met with military leaders and groups for ‘training’ in this country. His main objective was to make threats to --, ‘get out of country, now’ meaning within 24h. His real assigned objective was --, from the people he was working for, and associated with previous stated at high level.
Here was 'contractor' assigned to eight party talks for security, which hated the US, and was assigned to make threats to --, because someone did not wish -- to observe other things. And this related to other comments. He was also training military personnel in this country, ‘this person was 20 year Navy Veteran’.
The above ‘type’ may often be associated with some contractors in this type of business. There was clearly higher objective; all stated in previous and associated.
Some attp was made to expose but no-one was likely listening. Why 'N--y' contractor is the answer.
|
|
