Zorg51

In an interview with Alex Jones, recently, Jim Marrs set forth the plan to get alternative energy systems, etc., past the current blockade. He said, design it and do not patent it. Release it to the world via the internet and other ways, no patent. Then, set up company with rights to build the design or assist with the building of the design for the common man. Too many patents are purchased and mothballed. This would be an idea for getting past at least that one blockade. Jim specifically referenced an off the shelf energy system he saw exhibited at a recent conference that used hydrogen...it ran on water.
I'm not up on how this system would work, he said the byproduct would be Oxygen, my friend says no, it would be water. I cannot wrap my head around an energy system that would use the hydrogen in water and would end up with a byproduct the same as that with which you began.

Hydrogen is combustible, and can be used to power vehicles and other things with minimal changes required. But to extract H from H20 requires energy, and believe someone showed you how this can be accomplished using magnetic repulsion, with special rotor, maybe some hidden video. This in combination to above said, is the fastest solution for possible problem, because vehicles and other things use specific fuels. However such can be replaced, by applying the combination of both technologies for the fastest solution. Share such information with others.

Electric Cars, anyone?

Someone wrote detailed proposal in early 2008 about using the 25B to implement electric vehicle technology in U.S. Cities, and to build the support infrastructure for this technology. I believe this encompassed 25 cities, and about 30,000 electric vehicles per city to include charging facilities and other. This for replacing existing taxis’ for inner city transportation systems, with less C02, and less noise, where both “really need reduced”. This way the appropriate infrastructure for this technology can be developed. But behind the scenes would require some negotiation as to use electric vehicles more readily in cities, and of course fossil fuels more outside. Solar Cells were to be used in conjunction with available electrical energy for charging the batteries at these automated stations. The batteries were to be automatically changed at these stations from under the electrical vehicles. A global product would have resulted by developing this new inner city “transportation system”.

However, about 3 or more years were required, with year by year process, with substantial savings versus fossil fuels. If fact it was calculated as to sustain the businesses and with “small tax” generate $2 billion dollars per year to fund the railway projects or other, which require more time for implementation.

Batteries of such require lithium; I wonder who has this resource.

Very detailed, and completely ignored.

I listened to Alex / Jim Marrs and generally agreed with what was said but unfortunately they go beyond their field of expertise and make errors which then tends to undermine the thrust of what they are saying.

There's a good talk by the late Antony Sutton on Youtube where he warns about not exaggerating/creating info. as this can destroy the whole argument (sort of one rotten apple in the barrel) and going back to th Alex interview, Prof. Sutton explained (in his Dr. Stan 'Best Enemies' interview) that Germany could not have gone to war in 1939 without the technical assistance given to it by the Standard Oil/IG Farben technical interlock - enabling the production of aviation grade gasoline - whereas Jim painted some picture of East - West info. flow, such as A bomb technology coming from the Nazis. I believe that Von Braun got started by learning from American, Goddard. If I recall, that by accident or design, physicist Heisenberg (over) miscalculated the amount of fissile material needed to make a bomb. When Jim mentioned Uranium, I think, being transported by U235, I thought he was making some sort of clever joke.

In the world of quantum mechanics it does appear possible to at least 'borrow' energy from the future and have particles of matter appear from nothing and disappear the same way and get a net force between bodies in a vacuum (the Kasimir? effect) suggesting the possibility of extracting energy.

However, in the everyday world, getting something for nothing (outside crime, welfare and fractional reserve banking) seems to defy the laws of thermo. So 100 mpg carbs. on (didn't specify engine size) big block V8s seems improbable. Having said that, H2 would make a beautiful, high efficiency, near pollution free fuel which could be stored safely in hydride form. Much work has been done on producing hydrogen fuel but simply using tidal/wind/solar and electricity wouldn't involve science fiction.

somersdave,

Here’s a mechanical exercise, you have funnel and a “magic” marble. The marble is self propelled, it spins, so you place this magic marble within this funnel and it starts orbiting on the inner side. However, this funnel starts slowly spinning as well, and makes the marbles orbital path appear to slow, and slow again, and this funnel spins faster then marble appears to stop, and then the funnel maintains this speed. And yet the marble is still spinning, what is the funnel? What is the magic marble?

The article above will not be released, it's wasted time.

I wrote the proposal.

news.discovery.com/earth/afghanistan-minerals-lithium.htm

Give me several minutes, then will provide some examples of what people can do, to start companies. Types of electric vehicles.

I'm aware the 'Hydrogen, we need to make some steps.

I know how to make car function without fuel or battery, but step by step. Maybe the above two first.

25B is 25 billion dollars, 1-billion per city. And these cars had batteries, somehow I don't believe anyone is ready for magnet motor technology or other associated systems.