|
|
Post by kenny02 on May 23, 2013 22:05:46 GMT -5
Michael Adebolajo, Michael Adebowale..... Both WELL known to MI5. Accused of the murder of Afghanistan veteran Lee Rigby.
Tamerlan Tsarnaev.....WELL known to FBI, CIA. Accused of the Boston marathon bombing.
Massive Intel failure?
|
|
|
|
Post by burdawg on May 24, 2013 7:39:13 GMT -5
Convenient is more like it,helps with biometric identity database plans and the banning/registry of kitchen knives.They threw the borders open,encouraged asylum seekers (economic migrants) to be a burden on the economy whilst making sure the mass unwashed clearly perceive the special treatment.They want racial hatred and riots,and only when the weather is clement,have you noticed that through history? Did you notice the "free to practice sharia in our country" and he was British born? It is getting like flak.
|
|
|
|
Post by matrixirtam on May 24, 2013 18:44:15 GMT -5
Didn't anyone notice in the Woolrich video (convenient that he paused to give an interview) how he said quote, "fight your government, they don't care about you"---what an odd comment from a supposed Jihadist
Was he sent to further move the patriots to rise up so the NWO can put them down?
|
|
|
|
Post by kenny02 on May 25, 2013 13:07:53 GMT -5
|
|
Gutz
New Member
Posts: 19
|
Post by Gutz on May 26, 2013 2:57:35 GMT -5
I noticed a serious lack of blood at the attack site
|
|
|
|
Post by andyboy on May 26, 2013 9:51:06 GMT -5
Certain things occur to me about this "attack":
- no witnesses have been named.
- the guy who filmed the infamous video speech must have had some balls, to stand there and film someone who has just (allegedly) hacked someone to death (he apparently wants to remain anonymous - how convenient).
- passers by in the video seem very unconcerned, considering what went on.
- the guy in the video does not appear to have blood on his clothes.
- the alleged victim seems to exhibit no bleeding from the photographs available.
I wouldn't mind betting that the two "attackers" will not have their day in court - far too risky that the truth would out.
|
|
|
|
Post by matrixirtam on May 26, 2013 12:20:04 GMT -5
Totally agree. The people standing in the background looked more like crowds that stand in back of a news report. The people around looking at the supposed decapitated man are just lounging around as if they are waiting for someone to give out gift cards or something. If it was a real attack it was weird as heck. And how is it possible that a sharp shooter chick shows up and both attackers aren't killed? Only wounded?
|
|
|
|
Post by kenny02 on May 26, 2013 13:36:47 GMT -5
As a result of the Woolwich incident . From a report from the BBC. Keep an eye on this one......
"The bill, allowing the monitoring of all UK citizens' internet use, was dropped after a split in the coalition.
But Michael Howard said David Cameron had "to act in the national interest" following the Woolwich murder.
The bill - dubbed the "snoopers' charter" by opponents - was shelved earlier this year after Deputy Prime Minister and Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg said it was "not going to happen" while his party was in government.
But following the murder of soldier Lee Rigby in Woolwich last week in a suspected terror attack, a number of senior political figures have called for the bill to be revived. "
|
|
|
|
Post by andyboy on May 27, 2013 8:05:23 GMT -5
I also wonder if the autopsy/post-mortem of the deceased will be made public.
You can bet your life the internet bill will be revived; it's the only media source that the criminal elements of the intelligence community don't control.
|
|
