Post by unknown on Jun 11, 2013 9:09:02 GMT -5
www.youtube.com/watch?v=5yB3n9fu-rM
NSA Whistleblower, I have been telling people the abuses for 4 years, and longer.
Any system put in place can, and will be abused; my concern is why the "abuses" are not being invested. Can such a system be used for political purposes, yes? Can system be used where information is inserted, yes? Can information be deleted, yes?
So with such system in place, why isn’t this information used to stop high level witnesses from being cyber stalked since 2009, from company in India and phony front ends in U.S.?
Why when high level witness gathers information (me), including telephones and IP’s and thereafter files formal reports to FBI, DHS, and AG Office, they refuse to investigate.
Why are the abuses not being investigated when they are known and reported? While all information is being collected, and witnesses know these information’s are being collected?
One week ago, my computer hard drive was destroyed by hacker, for the purpose of attempting to destroy evidence. However, such was saved elsewhere prior too.
If whistle blower (witness) was working with FBI for high level investigation of weapons technology being passed abroad, why the FBI would refuse to investigate attacks to the witness? Why are such cyber stalking operations being directed toward witnesses as stated above? What does this mean, it breaking into email accounts, deleting emails, using ID theft to send email emails pretending to be witnesses, as well as other communications?
The above emails and site were saved, documented were formally reported to FBI (twice) one year and then again the following year, the DHS, and Attorney Generals Office. (All refused to investigate, knowing it would be simple to obtain the IP of the individuals sending these emails. (In Fact) as soon as the first emails were sent, the witness filed FBI report, and the email messages thereafter were sent for three months thereafter, with (NO) intervention. And this means the contracted attacker was so comfortable, they sent these emails for three months also knowing I was into and monitoring the account. The witness operation was from 2003-2005, the above attacks were in 2010, and heavy cyber stalking started from 2009-2013. Some cyber stalking from 2005-2008, but greatly intensified in 2009 from company in India, and operatives located in US. I though this would stop in 2009, but instead the attacks increased.
Which simply means information was (planted) using ID theft, and all the above offices were made aware. But, they refused to investigate and why, because this is sanctioned operation?
If the above is done, it will be done again and again too many others.
And if anything happens to witness is the FBI, DHS, and AG Office responsible?
Wakeup, Equal Protection Under the Law is for ‘every citizen’!
I known this NSA Whistle Blower knows more abuse is being performed, why is 'NO ONE' investigating the abuses?
NSA Whistleblower, I have been telling people the abuses for 4 years, and longer.
Any system put in place can, and will be abused; my concern is why the "abuses" are not being invested. Can such a system be used for political purposes, yes? Can system be used where information is inserted, yes? Can information be deleted, yes?
So with such system in place, why isn’t this information used to stop high level witnesses from being cyber stalked since 2009, from company in India and phony front ends in U.S.?
Why when high level witness gathers information (me), including telephones and IP’s and thereafter files formal reports to FBI, DHS, and AG Office, they refuse to investigate.
Why are the abuses not being investigated when they are known and reported? While all information is being collected, and witnesses know these information’s are being collected?
One week ago, my computer hard drive was destroyed by hacker, for the purpose of attempting to destroy evidence. However, such was saved elsewhere prior too.
If whistle blower (witness) was working with FBI for high level investigation of weapons technology being passed abroad, why the FBI would refuse to investigate attacks to the witness? Why are such cyber stalking operations being directed toward witnesses as stated above? What does this mean, it breaking into email accounts, deleting emails, using ID theft to send email emails pretending to be witnesses, as well as other communications?
The above emails and site were saved, documented were formally reported to FBI (twice) one year and then again the following year, the DHS, and Attorney Generals Office. (All refused to investigate, knowing it would be simple to obtain the IP of the individuals sending these emails. (In Fact) as soon as the first emails were sent, the witness filed FBI report, and the email messages thereafter were sent for three months thereafter, with (NO) intervention. And this means the contracted attacker was so comfortable, they sent these emails for three months also knowing I was into and monitoring the account. The witness operation was from 2003-2005, the above attacks were in 2010, and heavy cyber stalking started from 2009-2013. Some cyber stalking from 2005-2008, but greatly intensified in 2009 from company in India, and operatives located in US. I though this would stop in 2009, but instead the attacks increased.
Which simply means information was (planted) using ID theft, and all the above offices were made aware. But, they refused to investigate and why, because this is sanctioned operation?
If the above is done, it will be done again and again too many others.
And if anything happens to witness is the FBI, DHS, and AG Office responsible?
Wakeup, Equal Protection Under the Law is for ‘every citizen’!
I known this NSA Whistle Blower knows more abuse is being performed, why is 'NO ONE' investigating the abuses?