about your video titled: SANDY HOOK MURDERS Top Psychiatrist Discusses The Tragedy
there is also a scream of silence in your video about the facts that have been sketchy and changing, reported facts that were often in conflict or wrong in the medias. which is perfect for propaganda.
from north of your border, the state propaganda (radio/tv) was huge and went on for days, as if the american laws were in effect here. you could tell how direct the link is between american propagandists and state run butt-sniffers that we ear here is. just by the size of the footprint of that specific proaganda, and how insistent they were, you could tell right away is was fishy.
your choice of avoiding that side of the story will lessen the interest to your video and it's effect.
Post by Anthony Wicher on Dec 30, 2012 18:24:56 GMT -5
I agree with the previous poster. This analysis does not even consider the possibility that this event was staged. Yet there are blatant inconsistencies between the official story and available evidence. Pieczenik just takes the official story at face value – the kid went nuts, grabbed his mothers’s guns and killed 27 people – and takes that as a sign of the insanity of the society we live in, which it certainly is. But as with 9/11, I don’t think we can take the official story at face value. The official story that we were attacked by Al Qaeda on 9/11 is a fraud. The collapse of those towers is inexplicable by the official story, as anybody who understands even freshman physics and/or chemistry should know, and would know if they were not completely brainwashed by propaganda put out by authorities in whom they have a childlike trust. Please see ae911truth.org for the facts from experienced and qualified scientists, engineers and architects. Al Qaeda did have an indispensable role in 9/11, of course – they were used as patsies. The patsies were set up a couple of years in advance, sent to the United States (there was a visa office in Jedda issuing special visas for them) and sent to “flight school” at some sleazy CIA-linked outfits that were also smuggling drugs. The Saudis were financing them. But this was all just to make a phony trail of evidence. The planes were remote controlled and the buildings were blown up with high explosives. The patsies are absolutely essential to this MO. In the same way, we should be aware of the possibility that other mass murders could be staged. Whoever is really responsible for 9/11 might have done this too. The Breivik case strikes me as very suspicious, and also the Aurora case. This article on Sandy Hook by philosophy prof. Jim Fetzer is fairly solid. I like the way he starts by comparing it with the William Spengler fire case, which he says was not staged and did not have the signs of being staged, whereas Sandy Hook does.
Post by thegr8tscott on Dec 31, 2012 1:21:58 GMT -5
Dr. Steve I agree with your analysis. I actually posted an episode last week on Sandy Hook (http://www.shockthink.info/cofrmain.html) which your recent podcast has confirmed my point on the subject. If you get a chance I think you'll like it. I did not know about the Hunger Games. That is actually incredibly interesting. Great Podcast. I have a good feeling about 2013
Interesting comments and I agree that sandy hook may have more to it than meets the eye and I'd urge my friends to look up the dunblane massacre that occurred over here in the UK and its perpetrator Thomas Hamilton you will find it very interesting howeverthey have been two other major incidents of this nature namely the hungerford and cumbria shootings, which were carried out by sane people who clearly lost it, so I support a great deal of what Dr pieczenik says but I'd never rule out anything even more sinister, what interested me most was the comment regarding the sanity of Dr pieczeniks serial killer patients as I've long believed people whom carry out such crimes would have to be calm, cool, meticulous ect, the very opposite of mentally I'll or insane
Post by thegr8tscott on Dec 31, 2012 16:27:22 GMT -5
I do understand that the reports coming out of the media are getting crazier as the days go on. First it was his mom was a teacher at the school. That he killed his father etc etc. If we focus on the issue at hand which is violence and how it affects people psychologically then I think we would be doing society a favor. Here are some links of research on some of the subject matter. Enjoy......
Post by Genuine Risk on Jan 2, 2013 12:48:48 GMT -5
I had heard Ms. Collins (novelist) was a resident of Sandy Hook, but I'm not sure how much influence "The Hunger Games" had on Adam Lanza, if any. We can't know if he read those books or not. However, it is very interesting that Sandy Hook, per Dr. P., was a hub of gun-collecting, gun sports and gun Mfg., as well as a culture of "preppers." The "Sandy Hook Cocktail" is a perfect description of the confluence of influences that led to this tragedy: alcoholism, survivalist/apocalyptic paranoia/violent video games/gun culture.
Other alternative theories include the influence, if provable, of psychotropic drugs; if Adam Lanza was taking antii-depressants, Paxil, or psych meds, did that have a negative effect? We need more information.
A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Have too say the latest photo of Obama receiving the news of sandy hook was cynical to say the least! Who would want a photo opportunity of receiving terrible news? Put aside any in depth analysis this should be a moment of dignity and sorrow, a picture indeed speaks a thousand words
Post by Mike Kechula on Jan 10, 2013 14:04:17 GMT -5
Check out the statements from the Batman Shooter that something in the music (combined with the drugs) made him do it.
A similar statement was made by the shooter of Gabrielle Giffords down in Tucson. Something to the effect of someone was singing at the event and chanting instructions.
Then, check out the Obama Small Schools curricula, and the English program component that G. Loughner said contained grammatical structure that incited him to do it.
Then check out "Magick" and "Frogs into Princes."
Then check out the Hawaiian English Program, and its use of "decoding," hence "encoding" to propagandize youth into drugs, intelligence methods, right-wing and left-wing propaganda and violence.
About the latter, I know from personal experience since my dad fought the program in the 1970s.
Then check out Jon Ronson's book "The Men That Stare at Goats" and the use of subliminal message in the music.
Then look at how music changed our culture in the 1960s, precipitating an avalanche of sex, drugs, Marxism, anti-Vietnam War hysteria and almost brought this country to its knees.
Then ask some people in the media about the cult I fought against, called the Foundation of Human Understanding (headed by Talk Radio Network's Roy Masters), it's use of hypnotism, false pretenses, NLP and post-hypnotic suggestion to ruin families and more.
Post by citizen350000001 on Jan 10, 2013 21:49:37 GMT -5
Check out Steve's take on "the dangers of rock and roll" on his latest Al Gor podcast. He finds it to be laughable and I tend to agree. However, you have provided quite the case to the contrary. Yet your examples show calculated operations rather than simply mainstream music. Which leads me to wonder, maybe you're both correct. But if that's the case are these opposing positions separated by a thin line or a grey area? What part do psy-ops play in mainstream music? We know from the Zero Dark 30 podcast that it is ever evident in Hollywood films...
Post by annefrankwasparanoid on Jun 27, 2013 0:07:13 GMT -5
I hate to disagree with our host but it sounds like a diatribe against gun manufacturers, shooters & guns. I agree that games are brainwashing & drinking is not good for mom's liver or anyone else's liver or image. When I first watched the second plane hit the second tower I knew the terrorist had ordered the Air Force to stand down & I looked for the towers to implode. When the Globalist are doing all in their power to take our guns a rash of mass shootings cannot be considered as separate or non government exercises. Mind control goes back to the Spanish Inquisition. If you are curious go watch a session of the US Tax Court. The Judge is the Inquisitor & you are guilty unless you can prove otherwise. That's how I think of the Government. They are manipulating everything for their ultimate control. Even the alternate media refuses to run any stories on the World Bank scandal & Karen Hudes' effort to ban the Rockefeller crew from the World Bank. This would be the greatest step toward bringing down the Banking Cabal but it must be word of mouth. Every one with a radio program is ordered off this story. Look on the net for kahudes.
re. 'Sandy Hook', undermining the idea that there were no fatalities, a CN (finding my way round the US) caller on Alex's show last week (I think) who had local knowledge said that people had died. I find it difficult to imagine how an illusion could be successfully be given to the whole public.
Tragic though the event would appear, it all seems so hazy and so getting the truth out about the big events, like 9/11 where there is masses of visual and reported data and the day is etched in people's memories, must be the best avenue of exposure of the true nature of misused power (in recent times).
Last Edit: Jun 27, 2013 3:12:51 GMT -5 by somersdave
Post by somersdave on Jun 27, 2013 13:07:52 GMT -5
Sorry to deviate from Sandy Hook but here is another (shorter) interview of Karen Hudes this time with the the striking but slightly scary, Abby Martin of RT. Hudes seems genuine on the face of things, to me and interestingly questions the media attention focused upon Ed Snowden near the end of the discussion. (which seems to agree with some thoughts on another thread on this site)
On the subject of her good news - it may be a double edged sword - as collapse of World Banker power would seem to imply massive economic upheaval (the reason why various nations want gold or to get back the gold they have on deposit in New York and London in the hands of those pillars of probity (not).
While digging around, I noticed that there is an interview with Ms. Martin re. her nearly losing her job for asking Rand Paul a question (must have been a very difficult one!)