|
|
Post by firecracker on Aug 18, 2013 23:46:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by jk on Aug 20, 2013 17:46:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by jk on Aug 20, 2013 18:56:31 GMT -5
These fellows DO NOT work for free.
|
|
|
|
Post by RickH on Aug 20, 2013 19:23:06 GMT -5
jk
Thanks for the link, there appears another element ‘or platform’ that's troubling and associated with patsies, like Dorothy. It seems more propaganda is coming directly through RU and linked to earlier stated, that’s associated with Dorothy rumors (propaganda). As done previously, another platform for establishing leaks is formed, and this becomes troubling. But possibly beneficial for group wishing to control through method of ‘blackmail’ and get cash flows from any direction. The ‘blackmail’ can be associated with national security, and not the lesser.
And yes jk, this group seems to have large cash flows.
Dr. P regarding your blog,
It does appear the I/P politic problem is being used as diversion for larger operations being performed by global group tied to KGB operations. I refer to such, ‘old school’ as this relates to those experienced enough to plan and implement these operations and conduct psychological warfare in US. Fragment, and point us in wrong direction, then accuse our agencies for ‘their operations’.
RU-IN, CN-PK-IR can become troubling.
|
|
|
|
Post by jk on Aug 20, 2013 20:35:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by RickH on Aug 20, 2013 20:48:38 GMT -5
Your point?
|
|
|
|
Post by firecracker on Aug 20, 2013 20:49:58 GMT -5
Interesting stuff, guys, I am making it an early night. Dealing with a slight injury, gonna take an Advil and call it a night. I'll check in tomorrow, keep up the conversation, I look forward to catching up then!
|
|
|
|
Post by firecracker on Aug 20, 2013 20:55:32 GMT -5
Is JK's point that Snowden is bringing the government surveillance to the surface to desensitize the public to the increasingly tyrannical situation? Or perhaps I'm taking this the wrong direction.
My friend, with some intell friends says, "there is never a true leak"
Do you believe that? Are all 'leaks' intentional?
|
|
|
|
Post by jk on Aug 20, 2013 21:09:13 GMT -5
You got it, Firecracker!
This is why I live so FAR NORTH. "Spew" your guts now. The mass will absorb it slowly between Big Brother and Patriots game.Over time it will seep in.
|
|
|
|
Post by RickH on Aug 20, 2013 21:23:26 GMT -5
Audiences are created by good performers or ‘role players’, or who ‘you’ are told through media are good ‘role players’. Once this audience is established, then anything can be stated, for many various and different reasons or purposes.
Can they be used to further damage economies, by influencing contracts awards abroad? Can they be used as platform for leaking other information, by other peoples who wish for some cover and for business purposes as well? Can they be used to ‘blackmail’ peoples for decision making purposes through leaks, and likely more?
Was an earlier patsy established prior too the above?
|
|
|
|
Post by jk on Aug 20, 2013 22:17:27 GMT -5
Most are Patsies RickH.
The majority are numbed through Facebook,texting,
and Twitter...etc.
The Zombification, if that is a word, of the general public is astonishing.
|
|
|
|
Post by firecracker on Aug 21, 2013 12:54:47 GMT -5
What I have noticed watching those 'normal' people around me, is that families are fractured and that the people on the nightly news and good morning America type shows and other sitcoms that they view daily or weekly, become their 'family'.
It is similar to what has been happening in the pet industry. There is dehumanization of other people, and killing of humans seems to be no big deal.
Seems like every day, somewhere in this country, white people are being killed by mobs of black youths. No big deal. No national press.
But heaven help the poor person who raises a puppy and doesn't treat it better than a child....the full force of society's wrath will be brought against them.
Yet kids ending up dead after CPS takes them and puts them in a foster home gets little or no attention.
I don't think anyone visiting this forum fits the category I am referencing as 'normal'.
|
|
