|
|
Post by Dr. Steve Pieczenik on Jul 22, 2013 22:43:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by burdawg on Jul 22, 2013 23:54:57 GMT -5
Gordon Cooper,William Pawelec and John Callahan convinced me,credibility out the ying yang and honesty in their eyes,besides, AS17-136-20680 Apollo 17 photograph is just too compelling.
|
|
|
|
Post by burdawg on Jul 23, 2013 13:05:38 GMT -5
I am curious about something,with carbon dioxide levels being so low,the magnetosphere shrinking and all this methane being released(sinkholes)and heavy metals(geoengineering)Is it now possible to set fire to the atmosphere should a nuke be detonated? Just a thought.
|
|
|
|
Post by RickH on Jul 23, 2013 13:58:50 GMT -5
Has the strategy changed?
|
|
|
|
Post by RickH on Jul 23, 2013 14:12:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by firecracker on Jul 23, 2013 14:42:31 GMT -5
If the atmosphere is set on fire, and the methane is being sucked out of the sinks, will enough stability in the earth's surface be disturbed to destroy the D.U.M.B's and catacomb of tunnels?
And if the atmosphere goes up in flames, is there a planetary fire squad?
When you think of good and evil, sometimes it's easier to focus on those who produce and enable and those who destroy and threaten. It takes it out of the 'religious' realm.
|
|
|
|
Post by firecracker on Jul 23, 2013 15:00:41 GMT -5
Would an 'alien base be underwater....Bill Cooper....saw huge craft ascend from the water and rise into the sky.
Or maybe he was pulling a GD.
|
|
|
|
Post by firecracker on Jul 23, 2013 15:12:03 GMT -5
Has the strategy changed?
Maybe the question is, have scientists changed?
Quote from story of Manhattan Project:
'The atmosphere and oceans did not ignite. The world did not end in a planet-enveloping blaze of light. A few dozen physicists bet everything -- all life on the planet! -- on their ability to calculate in advance the result of an experiment that had never been tried before.'
They failed to ignite the atmosphere the first time they 'tried?' perhaps next time will be the winner.
|
|
|
|
Post by burdawg on Jul 23, 2013 18:41:01 GMT -5
Bigelow,private space programme.Gold is particularly good shielding,and they are grabbing that,once more,these are just private thoughts and I am glad I have a chance to share them.Thank you,excellent points,and I see I am not the only one to be familiar with thermobaric effects on bunkers.
|
|
|
|
Post by RickH on Jul 23, 2013 20:49:16 GMT -5
Besides missing funds, what is your opinion Dr. P?
I have another, but would like yours first...it may relate.
|
|
|
|
Post by firecracker on Jul 23, 2013 21:54:40 GMT -5
Interview with Bob Bigelow on Coast 2 Coast. He recommends confirmation, NOT disclosure. says he's seeing a lot o things in the media, perhaps the government has decided the time is right. www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4cqDkItHbA |
|
|
|
Post by RickH on Jul 24, 2013 14:37:33 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by firecracker on Jul 24, 2013 15:36:40 GMT -5
I'm not sure what to make of the UFO footage from the AFB. Perhaps it is just the quality of the video. But the 'darting and 'diving of the object and the fact that it was near an AFB, makes me wonder if it is an Area 51 object rather than from somewhere out there.
I believe UFO's are real....I've seen them. This one, however, did not 'act the way the ones I saw did or even on other videos of UFO's.
This one acts like it is being remote controlled by a 13 year old. The ones I have observed, hover, silently, move smoothly, and almost seem to vanish instantly when they decide to go.
It will be interesting to see what others think. I am keeping an open mind.
And speaking of 'mind', I think these real UFO's are controlled by thought rather than a joy stick. Which would further reinforce the lack of herky jerky movement in real UFO's.
And if it is 'ours, isn't it interesting how many years have passed and yet we know nothing of this technological development.
|
|
|
|
Post by burdawg on Jul 24, 2013 15:51:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by burdawg on Jul 24, 2013 16:16:45 GMT -5
|
|
