|
|
Post by firecracker on Jun 27, 2013 21:52:06 GMT -5
Elaborating a little....have you ever been close to someone and when you touched them or they you, it was as if for a millisecond you had a direct brain interface?
Everyone experiences some of this with a lover, I suspect, but I am talking about non-sexual connections. Just touch of one human to another. And isn't a lot of healing in the alternate health field centered on this? My friend, a Reiki master, practices this. Whether you analyze it as an energy connection, or whatever, isn't this very real?
Once that connection is established, if some form of communication is maintained, even if you are far apart, you still have that connection?
It is my humble theory that the ability I have in the past used to "download" things from another brilliant mind, have not been only raw IQ, but also, and perhaps even more importantly, an ability to sense or connect or directly download vital information from the other individual.
And continuing with that hypothesis a little further, it is also my theory, based on my experience, that even if the two never meet, if frequent, perhaps daily, communication is maintained for a longer period of time, that you also interface where you can almost finish their thought before they express it to you.
And isn't that what Google and all the other programs are doing. Only their reasons are not for lifting up human connection, but rather corrupting it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Googledoesnotthink on Jun 28, 2013 1:20:39 GMT -5
I solve complex problems when sleeping.
The work as presented was boring, several stages to the end stage, not complete. But you have solved one problem for me, I shall NEVER share my work again EVER.
Only to smallest of groups, and now you understand why the world is as so. And I why so many of my papers were stolen.
|
|
|
|
Post by Googledoesnotthink on Jun 28, 2013 2:10:32 GMT -5
Let us review,
Firstly, you slander me as do other 'associates, and make comments disappear as to disorientate the discussion, then later you accuse me as thief!
I know precisely what was presented on my works, and openly present the subject matter, for which no one slanders, no one calls me thief, or makes videos disappear. Many in past times have departed as so, and also left works of research for others to analyze and complete, such is very common. However, the first paragraph is uncommon, unless the objectivity is for something other.
Please, fill feel to make comments on the works as presented in youtube, as stated in first paragraph. If your theory is so, then such should be OK, however if not, then such would be illegal.
But then is your objective clear? All stated in the first paragraph.
Prove my 'theory as fore said wrong? Go onto a public format and practice your works here.
Maybe you should get further advice from 'Gordo, or does he hide now, because his works are being slowly exposed by many?
|
|
|
|
Post by Googledoesnotthink on Jun 28, 2013 5:56:14 GMT -5
And my humble theory,
You propose the communication is lacking, and yet comments disappear, and censorship is relevant and abundant throughout the internet. I shall not discuss “propulsion systems”, or “drives”, and “rockets” and other terminologies waiting to bait me. The old works in past studied were in fact “not viable”, but when made viable there are problems. Oh yes, the brilliant one was such that they did not solve the problem, and one solving this problem is nothing, what “New Concept”.
So if the brilliant one does not “propose the ideal”, then there’s no one to criticize to them. I believe this “solution” is brilliant as well, why share anything, maybe it’s this “ideal” where the problem resides.
Please continue, test your above humble theory, so that I may test mine.
Now if test is not performed, why present the humble theory? In fact, if no data was presented to support the theory, how was such conceived? Maybe you should Google and see if anything matches what you claim was that of another.
I believe your search will take many weeks, were the result will be non conclusion. Nothing matches.
And yet to another,
Important enough to copy such files from my computer, and delete from my disk drive.
Maybe that was the brilliant one, your talking about?
It’s a brave New World.
|
|
|
|
Post by Googledoesnotthink on Jun 28, 2013 6:03:42 GMT -5
And yet you believe, no one but me, observed such works stolen from my computer? That would be poor judgement.
|
|
|
|
Post by Googledoesnotthink on Jun 28, 2013 7:46:52 GMT -5
And yes,
I have patent things in past times. You will find this technology broadly used, for which I made nothing, and why?
Because my attorney said, I had to pay one-million dollars in advance for any proceedings to take place. Contacted others who refused to take such case, due to corp involved.
This my friend is the real world, and believe you know of such things.
In the field of Technology, often when someone creates something new, they must create the terminology as well.
Reasoning,
Someone may come across an ideal of extraordinary thought, and step by step progress such thing. And in doing so, create technologies through the discovery process of the "mind", some of which they have little interest. But wish to pass this to another for their examination, and possible use.
The exploration of such stages in technology had little to do with the ideal being explored. Just to understand whether or not, such technical stages could be achieved for the conception of the primary ideal.
It's time to go.
|
|
