Post by unknown on Jun 13, 2013 14:44:21 GMT -5
Now that things are going to get messy now, would it surprise you, the below (the companies) were located in South Carolina. What influence would this be?
Is it safe to go home now? Is the battle over, or just started. I am really tire now, 10 years is long time.
Reference May 3rd 2013 post. Message was for last FBI Director.
Letter to FBI Director,
I am former Army Ranger 2/75th special operations some years ago, counter terrorism for hijacked aircraft and diplomatic rescue. Unit was activated during this time, which required extensive training while applying special operational tactics. Other objectives were reconnaissance in countries to collect intelligence before conflicts. Small groups used for collecting information, which in return would save the lives of many soldiers thereafter (relates to below bottom). All this extensive training was performed by Vietnam Veterans like you, they were our leaders. And I fortunate enough to have this opportunity to work with these people, some of the best I have ever worked with in my life. Had friend about 20 years of age during the time, and remember this person for one reason. It was what they always talked about, their interest in opening bait or fishing shop in ‘Tennessee’ when their service was complete. This individual was extremely skilled, but knowing the above and risk need to ask, “Why would someone risk so much for so little?” Unfortunately, they never returned to Tennessee.
Many decisions made are with reference to the fore said, and leaders who taught me to be better, and to ‘always’ watch over our soldiers. And attempt to do so, in the best ways possible.
I know the FBI has dedicated people, likely the best agency in our government for investigation and law enforcement purposes. And can sense in many ways you are one of these good people, so wanted to ask several questions. But before, take one moment and look closely at your agents, some young, and maybe some aspire to be best in their profession. Some extremely talented and gifted, and will collectively pursue information and thereafter slowly place each piece into position until picture surfaces. If the picture being exposed is part of the hidden ‘machine’ and one growing larger each year, “Do you think they will survive?” And during this time will someone approach, and tell you to stop this investigation? People like myself, can sense the ‘hidden war’ between FBI and the hidden ‘machine’. And understand with their resources, technology, and wealth, many of your agents maybe at risk for peering into this picture. So once again and more, list questions below and several thereafter.
Questions for the FBI Director,
1. Why he stopped an investigation of ‘critical technology’ being passed to large Asian country in about 2005? Investigation was initiated by US Commerce Agent, thereafter passed to FBI.
2. And with this knowledge, and knowing this country passed such technology to N.K. and others in M.E. and during war? This was correct decision for ‘US National Security?’ Knowing this country was involved in specific Pakistan Weapon development in past.
3. Why did the former ‘president’ have to sign documents to ensure more components were delivered and thereafter distributed false media story. And this appears to have only covered-up the ‘systems and technology’ being passed. Including all the components delivered prior too, whereas the US Commerce Department was somewhat aware. But more so, after witness exposed this information and FBI was made more aware.
The above is information is ‘important’, because if such was not an important ‘National Security’ issue, ‘Why was this pushed all the way to the former president’s desk?’ It would seem only ‘pushing this responsibility’ to former president, means the FBI understood this to be serious National Security Risk. Otherwise you would not have pushed to this level.
Why was there no mention of the ‘small company’ partnered with ‘secret foreign weapons company (502)’, you knew, yet the false media stories suggested something different? This was secret government agency that later developed laser G. M. in this country. A false media report, with no mention of small company being partnered with secret weapons company?
4. Why he would stop this investigation knowing the ‘small company’ performing illegal works was partnered with ‘secret government weapons department (502)’ in this large Asian Country? When the small companies business was not in this area, and regardless would not have the legal right to do so. ‘National Security Issue’
5. Why he stopped such investigation knowing ‘scientific documents’ were illegally passed as well and to several other possible countries. One witness presented such fact, and FBI was aware. Why he stopped this investigation knowing hardware and ‘software source code’ was also illegally passed.
6. Did he have knowledge the ‘small company’ being owned by executives from ‘larger corporation’, were partnered with ‘C. Group’ for arms and military equipment contract deal in DC in mid 2007 with country receiving this ‘critical technology’. That formed x-company for the transaction, and such was acquired by B-E Systems.
7. Did he have knowledge the small company hired ‘B-Family member’ about time the investigation was stopped? Or the fact JP M--g-n was hosting the loans for these projects, and often small company received loans 3-4 times greater then capital delivered.
8. Why knowing some people were ‘assisting’ with investigation, have his investigators turn their attention and ignore witnesses? Why would the information about the ‘witnesses’ leak out from his department to the people passing the technology illegally? And after many threats to witnesses, his department would ignore ALL?
When the investigation was stopped, why were executives threatening witnesses. Was this because more illegal activity followed?
8. Why he sent one of his ‘agents’ to one ‘witnesses’ home, to tell them, ‘the investigation was stopped, because there’s too much business in this country”. Was this agent aware the small company hired B-Family member during this time. Why did the small company hire B-Family member?
9. Reference to the above, was the investigation stopped because of the deal made in the summer of 2007, in DC? With the large corporation who owned smaller country, and C. Group, both forming X-company for the transaction. And thereafter acquired by B-E Systems
10. Are these ‘business deals’ more important then ‘National Security’, and when do countries pass ‘critical technology’ to countries supporting opposition in conflict, during wartime. Why was this small company ‘quickly sold’ in (2008) prior to election, where ‘cash’ payment was made for amount much larger then ‘capital’ value. Small company had “NO” capital.
11. Another question, does he train the agents to tell people, “If large corporation comes after you, there’s nothing we can do?” Is this the new protocol?
12. And follow through, does he believe this will disappear through ‘avoidance’ and such technology was not distributed to NK and or M.E?
13. Does he believe this was ‘National Security Threat’ still today?
Continuing from the paragraph above,
Do you believe your agents and this country are safer, because the above activity was avoided? Or does this same business continue, and continue to fund these groups who prosper from these crimes.
Now look again at your agents, the ones stated in paragraph prior too. One or more in the future may come across similar situation, hidden ‘machine’, and may lose their life as result of their investigation. Because of monies and wealth obtained through this criminal activity, so the question becomes, “Can you live with this, knowing you could have stopped this activity or at least the money flows that make these crimes continue?”
Director, I can not avoid, because the risk was to our ‘Soldiers during war’ and to our ‘National Security’. Because of fast profits being made in this way, and the attempts made to terminate witnesses that continue. In the future one of those bright and skilled Agents may lose their lives during an investigation, and simply because they did not ‘understand’ the ‘hidden machine’ and ‘avoidance’ that continually fuels this criminal machine.
It has to start with ‘you’ not ‘me’. More and more is being exposed, why risk more.
You can’t ‘Avoid’ all such things, because this would make your department obsolete in time, but it also places your brightest and most dedicated people at the highest risk.
Is it safe to go home now? Is the battle over, or just started. I am really tire now, 10 years is long time.
Reference May 3rd 2013 post. Message was for last FBI Director.
Letter to FBI Director,
I am former Army Ranger 2/75th special operations some years ago, counter terrorism for hijacked aircraft and diplomatic rescue. Unit was activated during this time, which required extensive training while applying special operational tactics. Other objectives were reconnaissance in countries to collect intelligence before conflicts. Small groups used for collecting information, which in return would save the lives of many soldiers thereafter (relates to below bottom). All this extensive training was performed by Vietnam Veterans like you, they were our leaders. And I fortunate enough to have this opportunity to work with these people, some of the best I have ever worked with in my life. Had friend about 20 years of age during the time, and remember this person for one reason. It was what they always talked about, their interest in opening bait or fishing shop in ‘Tennessee’ when their service was complete. This individual was extremely skilled, but knowing the above and risk need to ask, “Why would someone risk so much for so little?” Unfortunately, they never returned to Tennessee.
Many decisions made are with reference to the fore said, and leaders who taught me to be better, and to ‘always’ watch over our soldiers. And attempt to do so, in the best ways possible.
I know the FBI has dedicated people, likely the best agency in our government for investigation and law enforcement purposes. And can sense in many ways you are one of these good people, so wanted to ask several questions. But before, take one moment and look closely at your agents, some young, and maybe some aspire to be best in their profession. Some extremely talented and gifted, and will collectively pursue information and thereafter slowly place each piece into position until picture surfaces. If the picture being exposed is part of the hidden ‘machine’ and one growing larger each year, “Do you think they will survive?” And during this time will someone approach, and tell you to stop this investigation? People like myself, can sense the ‘hidden war’ between FBI and the hidden ‘machine’. And understand with their resources, technology, and wealth, many of your agents maybe at risk for peering into this picture. So once again and more, list questions below and several thereafter.
Questions for the FBI Director,
1. Why he stopped an investigation of ‘critical technology’ being passed to large Asian country in about 2005? Investigation was initiated by US Commerce Agent, thereafter passed to FBI.
2. And with this knowledge, and knowing this country passed such technology to N.K. and others in M.E. and during war? This was correct decision for ‘US National Security?’ Knowing this country was involved in specific Pakistan Weapon development in past.
3. Why did the former ‘president’ have to sign documents to ensure more components were delivered and thereafter distributed false media story. And this appears to have only covered-up the ‘systems and technology’ being passed. Including all the components delivered prior too, whereas the US Commerce Department was somewhat aware. But more so, after witness exposed this information and FBI was made more aware.
The above is information is ‘important’, because if such was not an important ‘National Security’ issue, ‘Why was this pushed all the way to the former president’s desk?’ It would seem only ‘pushing this responsibility’ to former president, means the FBI understood this to be serious National Security Risk. Otherwise you would not have pushed to this level.
Why was there no mention of the ‘small company’ partnered with ‘secret foreign weapons company (502)’, you knew, yet the false media stories suggested something different? This was secret government agency that later developed laser G. M. in this country. A false media report, with no mention of small company being partnered with secret weapons company?
4. Why he would stop this investigation knowing the ‘small company’ performing illegal works was partnered with ‘secret government weapons department (502)’ in this large Asian Country? When the small companies business was not in this area, and regardless would not have the legal right to do so. ‘National Security Issue’
5. Why he stopped such investigation knowing ‘scientific documents’ were illegally passed as well and to several other possible countries. One witness presented such fact, and FBI was aware. Why he stopped this investigation knowing hardware and ‘software source code’ was also illegally passed.
6. Did he have knowledge the ‘small company’ being owned by executives from ‘larger corporation’, were partnered with ‘C. Group’ for arms and military equipment contract deal in DC in mid 2007 with country receiving this ‘critical technology’. That formed x-company for the transaction, and such was acquired by B-E Systems.
7. Did he have knowledge the small company hired ‘B-Family member’ about time the investigation was stopped? Or the fact JP M--g-n was hosting the loans for these projects, and often small company received loans 3-4 times greater then capital delivered.
8. Why knowing some people were ‘assisting’ with investigation, have his investigators turn their attention and ignore witnesses? Why would the information about the ‘witnesses’ leak out from his department to the people passing the technology illegally? And after many threats to witnesses, his department would ignore ALL?
When the investigation was stopped, why were executives threatening witnesses. Was this because more illegal activity followed?
8. Why he sent one of his ‘agents’ to one ‘witnesses’ home, to tell them, ‘the investigation was stopped, because there’s too much business in this country”. Was this agent aware the small company hired B-Family member during this time. Why did the small company hire B-Family member?
9. Reference to the above, was the investigation stopped because of the deal made in the summer of 2007, in DC? With the large corporation who owned smaller country, and C. Group, both forming X-company for the transaction. And thereafter acquired by B-E Systems
10. Are these ‘business deals’ more important then ‘National Security’, and when do countries pass ‘critical technology’ to countries supporting opposition in conflict, during wartime. Why was this small company ‘quickly sold’ in (2008) prior to election, where ‘cash’ payment was made for amount much larger then ‘capital’ value. Small company had “NO” capital.
11. Another question, does he train the agents to tell people, “If large corporation comes after you, there’s nothing we can do?” Is this the new protocol?
12. And follow through, does he believe this will disappear through ‘avoidance’ and such technology was not distributed to NK and or M.E?
13. Does he believe this was ‘National Security Threat’ still today?
Continuing from the paragraph above,
Do you believe your agents and this country are safer, because the above activity was avoided? Or does this same business continue, and continue to fund these groups who prosper from these crimes.
Now look again at your agents, the ones stated in paragraph prior too. One or more in the future may come across similar situation, hidden ‘machine’, and may lose their life as result of their investigation. Because of monies and wealth obtained through this criminal activity, so the question becomes, “Can you live with this, knowing you could have stopped this activity or at least the money flows that make these crimes continue?”
Director, I can not avoid, because the risk was to our ‘Soldiers during war’ and to our ‘National Security’. Because of fast profits being made in this way, and the attempts made to terminate witnesses that continue. In the future one of those bright and skilled Agents may lose their lives during an investigation, and simply because they did not ‘understand’ the ‘hidden machine’ and ‘avoidance’ that continually fuels this criminal machine.
It has to start with ‘you’ not ‘me’. More and more is being exposed, why risk more.
You can’t ‘Avoid’ all such things, because this would make your department obsolete in time, but it also places your brightest and most dedicated people at the highest risk.