On Tuesday, the Constitution Project, Washington, DC, released a 577-page report by its “Task Force on Detainee Treatment” documenting WAR CRIMES committed by Clinton, Bush and Obama including unthinkable atrocities punishable by life in prison or death.
An article contained in the most recent Military.com newsletter indicated Obama's conversation with Medvedyev, accidentally caught on a live mike prior to Obama's re-election was blatant evidence of treason by the president. The follow up conversation after he was re-elected (seemed pretty certain of that) includes discussions of reduction of U.S. nuclear weapons in cooperation with Russia.
Since when is it appropriate for a U.S. president to discuss reduction of American defenses with a nuclear armed former enemy? Our "commander--in-chief" not only appears to be eliminating military personnel based on whether they'll fire on American citizens but seems to be negotiating away defense mechanisms that led to this nation's classification as a superpower.
Disarming American citizens on an individual basis as well as disarming military defense systems makes you wonder whose side this president is on. How long will he be allowed to continue reducing this country to defenseless? And why?
Post by firecracker on May 17, 2013 20:49:25 GMT -5
Last time Steve was on Alex Jones, Alex freaked out at Steve's call to action. Today, Alex in a half sentence explanation (at least I believe he was referring to the SP interview) said he freaked out at the possibility of a military coup. This was brought out because of the article posted on Infowars today that says the military has given itself the right to act domestically without congressional or executive authorization in the event of civil unrest. Which Alex seems to believe sets the stage for a military coup. So I ask all here, is there a COUP afoot? What say you? And secondly, would, hypothetically, a military coup here be any better than the (bad) history of military coups elsewhere? And is the new film, White House Down, predictive programming?
Let's see, we have multiple documents indicating that there's an undocumented, illegal in the White House, granting himself the authority to murder U.S.citizens with immunity and no oversight. Whilst he publicly admits to murdering thousands of victims, deprived of due process in countries we are not at war with. When did murder become legal in this country?
The Supreme Court refusing to review evidence of his qualifications as a natural born citizen, a requirement of the presidency, even though the birth certificate he supplied on the Internet has been proven to be a fraud.
An Attorney General under indictment for criminal contempt of congress, but not prosecuted or in jail.
Intelligence Agency commanders overtly lying to congress under oath, but not charged with any crime.
While currently that same President is making announcements in Germany that he is "Pursuing the merger of the U.S. with the E.U." that would require surrender of U.S. sovereignty, without announcing anything to the American people. After fighting the revolutionary war and winning our independence, where does this president get the authority for that?
Seems to me the coupe has already taken place but hasn't been officially announced yet.
This is a very lengthy attachment. I haven't read it all, but will.
What I have read appears to be pertinent, so far, to the year 2000. Much has changed since then. The police have been militarized and appear to have gone to the other side in many cases. Charmed by increased fire power donated by the federal government, can this advisory still be applicable?
Perhaps the answers lie in the remaining text. We shall see.
The lawlessness of this "president" is unprecedented as he is held to no accountability by congress, to constitutional law or the American people. Whether it's funding and supporting TERRORISTS, while claiming American constitutional rights must be eliminated to FIGHT TERRORISM, or engaging American military in Afghanistan to assist in the farming of poppy fields for drugs, at the same time spending millions on funding the DEA to "fight the war on drugs", or blatantly running guns and drugs for profit whether in Mexico or Benghazi, ...where is the line drawn?
No matter whether the House or the Senate conducts investigative hearings, since none of the witnesses who commit perjury are held accountable for lying under oath, or if congress votes on issues brought before them or the Senate, ...even if the issue fails to be approved according to constitutional requirements, the president and his administration simply ignore any and all law. Squandering billions on foreign aid and illegal covert wars around the world without authorization, while Americans are living in poverty, loosing their homes, American children are starving, in unprecedented numbers, Mr. President spends one hundred million dollars to take HIS family on a trip to Africa just before he takes another luxury family vacation on Martha's Vineyard. What will it take to stop him?
Follow this link for his latest "in your face, I do anything I want, anytime I want," episode. freedomoutpost.com/
We can only hope that all the militarization and weapons so graciously bestowed on local law enforcement throughout the country is being stocked and made ready to be turned on him and the rest of the criminals who support him and/or fail to hold him accountable to the law if and when he exercises all the unlawful authority he has granted himself to attack and destroy this nation under martial law.
If our local sheriffs, state police, national military personnel, and county law enforcement agencies don't recognize what this "commander-in-chief" is doing to the only country that is theirs to live in freedom, with their families, friends and loved ones, ...within communities that understand and treasure what the American dream can mean, no greater loss than theirs will haunt their lives forever. Should they choose to follow orders to vaccinate, imprison, destroy, torture and kill innocent victims of a fraudulent government, that has stolen their wealth, their honor and their future, nothing will be left to go "home" to at the end of the day...even for them.
I rather believe in the capability and willingness of all who will choose to defend this great nation in all its glory from the few (less than 500 politicians) who constitute the worst government in our nation's history. When the time is right and "the straw that breaks the camel's back" is forced upon us, the tinderbox they have created will ignite, focusing all aim on those who have knowingly and willingly refused to right this ship. Their reign of terror, with a little luck, can be turned in their direction with such fury and such force ...that can only be found in numbers. Numbers...infuriated with rage against the power that has betrayed this nation ...no matter how many Russian and Chinese they import to defend them, all will fall on the path to where they live ...and destroy what's left of them.
The Leaders of "Oath Keepers" and Citizens against the NDAA have just reported an attempted "set up" to discredit them and their efforts. There can be no greater evidence that the Washington criminal's greatest threat lies within an educated, organized population who refuses to accept their illegal, unconstitutional "authority" and control.
Accomplished by the intentional default on the contract that originally bound the United States together, provisions, limitations and division of federal power into three separate branches of government...commonly known as "checks and balances, exists in name only. Rendering any authority of the federal government to rule this nation as null and void.
Eliminated by its own failure to uphold its contractual obligations with the citizens and states of this nation, specifically included within that contract: "To protect, preserve and defend the RIGHTS of the people of this country, the federal government and any claim of its authority to create law that violates the supreme law of this land is erroneous and false.
Disguised with claims that the federal government's authority is now predicated upon its responsibility to "PROTECT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE" as stated by the President, he cleverly and continually mis-states the duties assigned to the executive branch and the federal government in the constitution. Executive and federal authority is restricted ONLY to protecting the "RIGHTS" OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.
Found guilty of war crimes, by their own investigative bi-partisan panel, this president and at least 3 of his predecessors have not been prosecuted. This demonstrates the federal government's failure to "protect the American people" even if their claims were justified. The ongoing illegal war crimes by a sitting president who continues to order mass murder of innocents, indefinite detention without due process of law, active support for funding of world wide terrorism is blatantly reprehensible.
Even IF the president's misstatements were accurate, claiming he is "protecting the American people" at the same time he partakes in the worst illegal criminal behavior known to man is an oxymoron of gargantuan proportion.
For information regarding suggestions to deal with this tyrannical siege of freedom, see "Revolution" a video presentation offered by "Storm Clouds Gathering," available on YouTube. Offering common sense information, it is empowering and worth the twenty minutes spent to view it.
We will all share the same fate without an active networking of resources and recruitment. My member email address is visible. I'm a moderator for BATR Reddit Community.
www.reddit.com/r/BATR/ Looking for readers to join. Hope you will check out the content, post on BATR, recommend to your friends and share items.
Open to organize efforts.
I'm a moderator for BATR Reddit Community www.reddit.com/r/BATR/ Looking for readers to join. Hope you will check out the content, recommend to your friends and share items. Read - Join - Post - Share - Recruit
Post by firecracker on Feb 25, 2014 23:23:58 GMT -5
Looking at your post from simply a strategic viewpoint, there appear to be a number of problems with a military coup. a. they usually result in an extended period of chaos which results in martial law and loss of liberty and eventually a dictatorship, often by a puppet of some group. b. if it were a purely patriot coup, it would have to deal with a largely dependent citizenry who would because of their dependence on the current system and their complete ignorance of even the most rudimentary aspects of the problem, become the enemy of the coup. c. that would result in those who undertook the coup being surrounded by both those with allegiance to the current regime and those in the citizenry opposed to the change. d. and in the interim, the nation would be vulnerable to attack from outside What say you?