"You do not have a Commander in Chief! He has been

Mr. Pieczenik
I am a big fan of your information. The indictments are huge. Why is there nothing moving forward with this revelation? the Info Wars piece that is out is amazing. Is there a great deal more that we don't know? What can we do to get information out to others?

Letter to FBI Director,

I am former Army Ranger 2/75th special operations some years ago, counter terrorism for hijacked aircraft and diplomatic rescue. Unit was activated during this time, which required extensive training while applying special operational tactics. Other objectives were reconnaissance in countries to collect intelligence before conflicts. Small groups used for collecting information, which in return would save the lives of many soldiers thereafter (relates to below bottom). All this extensive training was performed by Vietnam Veterans like you, they were our leaders. And I fortunate enough to have this opportunity to work with these people, some of the best I have ever worked with in my life. Had friend about 20 years of age during the time, and remember this person for one reason. It was what they always talked about, their interest in opening bait or fishing shop in ‘Tennessee’ when their service was complete. This individual was extremely skilled, but knowing the above and risk need to ask, “Why would someone risk so much for so little?” Unfortunately, they never returned to Tennessee.

Many decisions made are with reference to the fore said, and leaders who taught me to be better, and to ‘always’ watch over our soldiers. And attempt to do so, in the best ways possible.

I know the FBI has dedicated people, likely the best agency in our government for investigation and law enforcement purposes. And can sense in many ways you are one of these good people, so wanted to ask several questions. But before, take one moment and look closely at your agents, some young, and maybe some aspire to be best in their profession. Some extremely talented and gifted, and will collectively pursue information and thereafter slowly place each piece into position until picture surfaces. If the picture being exposed is part of the hidden ‘machine’ and one growing larger each year, “Do you think they will survive?” And during this time will someone approach, and tell you to stop this investigation? People like myself, can sense the ‘hidden war’ between FBI and the hidden ‘machine’. And understand with their resources, technology, and wealth, many of your agents maybe at risk for peering into this picture. So once again and more, list questions below and several thereafter.

Questions for the FBI Director,

1. Why he stopped an investigation of ‘critical technology’ being passed to large Asian country in about 2005? Investigation was initiated by US Commerce Agent, thereafter passed to FBI.

2. And with this knowledge, and knowing this country passed such technology to N.K. and others in M.E. and during war? This was correct decision for ‘US National Security?’ Knowing this country was involved in specific Pakistan Weapon development in past.

3. Why did the former ‘president’ have to sign documents to ensure more components were delivered and thereafter distributed false media story. And this appears to have only covered-up the ‘systems and technology’ being passed. Including all the components delivered prior too, whereas the US Commerce Department was somewhat aware. But more so, after witness exposed this information and FBI was made more aware.

The above is information is ‘important’, because if such was not an important ‘National Security’ issue, ‘Why was this pushed all the way to the former president’s desk?’ It would seem only ‘pushing this responsibility’ to former president, means the FBI understood this to be serious National Security Risk. Otherwise you would not have pushed to this level.

Why was there no mention of the ‘small company’ partnered with ‘secret foreign weapons company (502)’, you knew, yet the false media stories suggested something different? This was secret government agency that later developed laser G. M. in this country. A false media report, with no mention of small company being partnered with secret weapons company?

4. Why he would stop this investigation knowing the ‘small company’ performing illegal works was partnered with ‘secret government weapons department (502)’ in this large Asian Country? When the small companies business was not in this area, and regardless would not have the legal right to do so. ‘National Security Issue’

5. Why he stopped such investigation knowing ‘scientific documents’ were illegally passed as well and to several other possible countries. One witness presented such fact, and FBI was aware. Why he stopped this investigation knowing hardware and ‘software source code’ was also illegally passed.

6. Did he have knowledge the ‘small company’ being owned by executives from ‘larger corporation’, were partnered with ‘C. Group’ for arms and military equipment contract deal in DC in mid 2007 with country receiving this ‘critical technology’. That formed x-company for the transaction, and such was acquired by B-E Systems.

7. Did he have knowledge the small company hired ‘B-Family member’ about time the investigation was stopped? Or the fact JP M--g-n was hosting the loans for these projects, and often small company received loans 3-4 times greater then capital delivered.

8. Why knowing some people were ‘assisting’ with investigation, have his investigators turn their attention and ignore witnesses? Why would the information about the ‘witnesses’ leak out from his department to the people passing the technology illegally? And after many threats to witnesses, his department would ignore ALL?

When the investigation was stopped, why were executives threatening witnesses. Was this because more illegal activity followed?

8. Why he sent one of his ‘agents’ to one ‘witnesses’ home, to tell them, ‘the investigation was stopped, because there’s too much business in this country”. Was this agent aware the small company hired B-Family member during this time. Why did the small company hire B-Family member?

9. Reference to the above, was the investigation stopped because of the deal made in the summer of 2007, in DC? With the large corporation who owned smaller country, and C. Group, both forming X-company for the transaction. And thereafter acquired by B-E Systems

10. Are these ‘business deals’ more important then ‘National Security’, and when do countries pass ‘critical technology’ to countries supporting opposition in conflict, during wartime. Why was this small company ‘quickly sold’ in (2008) prior to election, where ‘cash’ payment was made for amount much larger then ‘capital’ value. Small company had “NO” capital.

11. Another question, does he train the agents to tell people, “If large corporation comes after you, there’s nothing we can do?” Is this the new protocol?

12. And follow through, does he believe this will disappear through ‘avoidance’ and such technology was not distributed to NK and or M.E?

13. Does he believe this was ‘National Security Threat’ still today?

Continuing from the paragraph above,

Do you believe your agents and this country are safer, because the above activity was avoided? Or does this same business continue, and continue to fund these groups who prosper from these crimes.

Now look again at your agents, the ones stated in paragraph prior too. One or more in the future may come across similar situation, hidden ‘machine’, and may lose their life as result of their investigation. Because of monies and wealth obtained through this criminal activity, so the question becomes, “Can you live with this, knowing you could have stopped this activity or at least the money flows that make these crimes continue?”

Director, I can not avoid, because the risk was to our ‘Soldiers during war’ and to our ‘National Security’. Because of fast profits being made in this way, and the attempts made to terminate witnesses that continue. In the future one of those bright and skilled Agents may lose their lives during an investigation, and simply because they did not ‘understand’ the ‘hidden machine’ and ‘avoidance’ that continually fuels this criminal machine.

It has to start with ‘you’ not ‘me’. More and more is being exposed, why risk more.

You can’t ‘Avoid’ all such things, because this would make your department obsolete in time, but it also places your brightest and most dedicated people at the highest risk.

I, too, have wondered what would be left to fill the void if "all" the corrupt psychopaths were prosecuted and convicted.

Although it is agreed that allowing the criminal corruption to continue unabated is the immediate problem, since it is quickly leading to a fascist dictatorship in this country, "symphony"has hit the nail on the head.

Main stream media pundits must be exposed as unquestionably complicit in the plot to destroy America. If the major news media started reporting the truth rather than claiming the "truth" is nothing but "conpiracy theories" there would a massive awakening in this country.

The majority of Americans must be truthfully informed before any real progress toward ending the globalist coupe can take place. Once the lies and cover-ups about both 9/11 attacks and the rest of the "terrorist" attacks is broadcast on main stream media as relentlessly as the propaganda has been, I believe the outcry for justice will be unstoppable.

There is no "honor among thieves". The arrogance of the pundits blinds them to the fact that once their usefulness has been exhausted, they will be tossed like yesterday's trash. Perhaps finding that they haven't been exempted from the government's spying on the AP communications will enlighten the press that they will not be exempted from the consequences of their "cooperation" that David Rockerfeller so graciously acknowledged at that CFR luncheon.

Even the power of the massive corporations that has been allowed to grow (notice the most powerful are those that have the tightest ties to corruption in government) ...to such massive proportion will one day be victimized because they will pose a threat to the power of the elites to own and run the planet. The public has been turned against corporate power before and it will happen again...or does no one remember the government anti-trust laws that were enacted to contain corporate power.

The media can turn this around by reporting the truth about the dangers that the American people are facing. The importance of restoring the constitution as the supreme law of the land must be emphasized because without it, the last hope for freedom, justice and liberty will be annihilated. How the media giants can blind themselves to the consequences of a world without those essentials will affect them, has to be based on unabated arrogance. The elites know how to manipulate them as well as they know how to manipulate everything else they need to win the game.

They're "all in" this time. They're in it to win it. They've waited and plotted since their last attempt failed when Prescott Bush and his attempted military coupe to overthrow the U.S. GOVERNMENT was thwarted by Marine General Smedley Butler. Exposing the truth to the Ameircan people as fact, is the only hope left. If that can be accomplished, the rest will follow like a game of dominoes.

To what is the hidden hand attached? We talk about the man behind the curtain. But the puppets like the manipulation and the reward it brings. And until and unless we can find individuals of moral fiber and caliber who are willing to be free and in turn to protect our freedoms, destroying the man behind the curtain will only cause the puppets to search for a new master whose hand contains string and money.
I would like to offer that the puppets must be taught that there is an enormous price to pay for being a puppet. The potential puppets must look at the fate of the current puppets and reject the hand. The consequences must be proportionally more dire to offset the reward. The puppets are vulnerable. They should be our target. And if we are successful, and they cause the hand behind the curtain to step out of the shadows, THEN we deal with the specter to which it is attached.

Symphony, your analogy shows that you completely missed my point. It has NOTHING to do with being good little doggies.
The puppets must be taught that DEATH or DESTRUCTION befalls a puppet. Of course there is an endless supply of puppets. Why wouldn't there be? If there are no consequences to consider and only benefits.
The puppets will protect the puppet masters....and BTW, the puppets control the weaponry and the people who control the weaponry.
It's my humble opinion that those who think as you, aiming at the top, are only kidding yourselves. You can topple the highest building by destroying the foundation. The lowly sell-outs who provide the base upon which those at the top carry out their dirty deeds....topple those, make an example of them, destroy them, and the new puppets will have to think twice before crawling into the positions their former puppets held.
Crush the puppets....one after one.....then watch the mighty fall!

Speech about his drone attacks?

When will 'he' present his speech regarding his cyber stalking operations against US Vets, through companies in India?

It's strange how these operations begin in 2009, about the time some companies received stimulus dollars in this country.

Eric Holder knows all about the cyber stalking operations, and reason they continue. I guess after the appropriate body count is obtained a ‘private’ speech will be made to celebrate.

Wonder how many vets commented suicide as result of this large cyber stalking operation? Or let’s call by real name, “covert war against people in US”.

Oh that’s right ‘one of his contractors claims there’s about 350,000 vets on their list, but 'he' stated they only wish to get rid of a few thousand trouble makers. It's obvious their after more then this amount.

I guess few years from now, you can analyze the body count, I’m sure this operation is “C”, how else could you murder Americans. The “list”, was always about "murdering Americans", and one reason you’re being distracted. Did you really believe they would establish a list of people they don't like, and not use different methods in attempting to murder them? Of course they would.

How will these above killings be justified? I guess the new laws provide our presidents with perks to murder anyone they wish, or contract offshore resources to do the job. Some of their contractors brag about the monies they make in these operations.

From what I discovered researching and infiltrating these operations, it’s my belief the 'larger body count' is being accumulated in the US, ‘secretly’.

Because Eric Holder knows nothing, but actually he 'knows everything'.